-
From J6 to Journalism: Mulholland’s Troubling Ties to Extremism
Claim: Mulholland’s on-air presentation and statements about being both “reporter” and “protester” at a politically volatile event undermine the independence expected of journalism and should be evaluated as a conflict-of-role under standard ethics frameworks.[1] [2] Key point: This post is…
-
The Hammer and Sickle Journalist: Why Mulholland’s Branding Exposes His Extremist Leanings
” Claim: Mulholland’s on-brand use of the hammer-and-sickle iconography functions as an explicit ideological signal that undermines claims of neutral, independent journalism and should be treated as disclosed bias—not “just aesthetics.”[1] Key point: Branding choices are not evidence of wrongdoing…
-
Weaponizing Facial Recognition: Why Paul Mulholland’s Own Words Show He’s No Journalist
Thesis: By his own description, this is a face-matching → legal identity → phone number workflow. That is a surveillance-style de-anonymization pipeline, not standard reporting practice for non-public figures.[1] “try to do some like facial recognition stuff to find them……